<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brandthony &#187; What Were They Thinking?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brandthony.com/category/what-were-they-thinking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brandthony.com</link>
	<description>Blogging A Branded World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:58:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>BING Is Good, But It&#8217;s Not Google</title>
		<link>http://brandthony.com/2009/08/bing-is-good-but-its-not-google/</link>
		<comments>http://brandthony.com/2009/08/bing-is-good-but-its-not-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 04:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Perez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategic Miscues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What Were They Thinking?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandthony.com/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


			
				
			
		
It&#8217;s really unfortunate when the brand name for your competitor works against you this way. I know I&#8217;m late to the party on this one, but found it too funny to not repost. This comes from a TechCrunch comment
BING is okay,
But
It’s
Not
Google
Burn.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fbrandthony.com%2F2009%2F08%2Fbing-is-good-but-its-not-google%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;locale=en_US" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height: 60px"></iframe></p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbrandthony.com%2F2009%2F08%2Fbing-is-good-but-its-not-google%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbrandthony.com%2F2009%2F08%2Fbing-is-good-but-its-not-google%2F&amp;source=brandthony&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 22px;">It&#8217;s really unfortunate when the brand name for your</span> competitor works against you this way. I know I&#8217;m late to the party on this one, but found it too funny to not repost. This comes from a <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/05/bing-has-succeeded-in-finding-the-worst-jingle-ever/#comment-2903836">TechCrunch comment</a></p>
<blockquote><p>BING is okay,</p>
<p><strong>B</strong>ut<br />
<strong>I</strong>t’s<br />
<strong>N</strong>ot<br />
<strong>G</strong>oogle</p></blockquote>
<p>Burn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brandthony.com/2009/08/bing-is-good-but-its-not-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
